Orientalism: Not "an airy European fantasy about the orient but a created body of theory and practices".Orientalism revolutionized the study of middle-east and helps to create and shape entire new fields of study such post-colonial theory as well influencing disciplines as diverse as English, History, anthropology, political science and cultural studies. In any field when a concept is discussed, it will entail everything that is associated. In Orientalism, Orientalist represents Orient(As their voices are suppressed, they're given voice by Orientalist). They aren't hidden in text, but exterior and so represented. EDWARD SAID SAID: My interest in Orientalism began for two reasons(the immediate war between Arabs and Israel people in 1973 and disparity between what I experienced being an Arab and how is the representation of what I saw as art). The former was already preceded by lot of images and discussions in the media in the popular press of how the arabs are coward, they don't know how to fight and those are going to be beaten as they aren't modern(misconceptions perceived by media and popular press). But when in October 1973, Egyptian army crossed the canal, all were surprised to see how they demonstrated that they can fight with anyone else and that was one immediate impulse. How it is when you base everything on your perceptions, but suddenly when something unusual, unwanted came out you're disturbed from inside because you only want someone to be as you wanted. An another interpretation can also be made here that in European's looking towards Orients as inferior, backward looking, static, based mere on their perceptions. It can be assumed as when they came to know that Orients are rich in artistic works and objects, while they don't possess such qualities, and only the manipulative political knowledge and some adopted manners of Europeans, so they can be entitled as superior and if the Orients are given some space and importance, they will be able to acquire their place in politics and which was sounded unusual and unwanted to seemingly European manipulative minds and so they were always speaking for arabs in derogatory and disparaging manner, with due aim to demoralize them. In latter reason, Edward Said himself had tried to identify the representation of Orients in the form of artistic works by great artists Delacroix, Andy and Gerome and the novelists who wrote about the orient like Disraeli or Flaubert and he came to know the fact that those representations have very little to do with what he has as background of his life and this reason pushed him to write history again, in the form of Orientalism term(the Orients seen through Orientalism lens). It can be concluded that one reason talks about misconceptions nurtured by media and popular press for arabs and then something unusual happened and another the difference between experience of being an arab and superficial representation of arabs/orients. |
Aladdin and Arabic Nights: Artistic representation of Arabic World. In repertory of Orientalism In 1850s or 1860s let's say from London or Paris, if somebody wish to look, they would find very little chance to address that subject freely and in creative way A great deal of writing had gone before and this form of writing was in organised form, which Edward Said is considering organised form of Science and so it is called Orientalism. Where it is said that there was a kind of repertory of images that kept on coming: A sensual woman, who is there to be sort of used by man, the East as a kind of mysterious place and full of monsters, "the marvel's of the East" was a phrase that was used that the more I looked the more I saw this was really quite consistent of itself. It has very little to do with poeple who had been there and even they had been there, there wasn't much modification. In other words you didn't get what you could call the realistic representations of the Orients either in Literature or in paintings or in music or in any kind of arts. This was further extended by experts. But one can't find any modification either in Edward William Lane's Modern Egyptians(produced in 1830s) or somebody writing in 1920s. A great example of wonderful Gerard De Nerval french poet, who had been to the Orient on a voyage and Said was reading his book of travels in Syria, where he found that all Orients are the same assets, there develops a kind of image of Orients being timeless, unlike West, they can't develop. And this is a kind of problem with Orientalism that it creates an image outside the history, the image that is placid, still and eternal. Which is simply contradicted by the fact of History. In a sense you might say it is a creation of you might say for Europe an ideal other. Orientalism can be seen as giving life to something which is dull and dead(seen by Europeans) decorating with different associated colours(which can be seen through gaps) creating a theory an a new extension to Orients. |
Though they had produced many artistic works, but still considered as violent and fanatic.
One other aspect was also seen that they were static and placid like people, that they were intolerable of others' cultures' involvement.
So Edward Said is saying lastly by mingling his argument with Antonio Gramsci that "If they had seen their very relation with others, it wouldn't have happened". But it isn't still clear if the reason was this, there may be many reasons..