Such tasks are assigned by our department, to see If their students's analytical, critical, comprehensive and reflective tendency is developed or not...And are they able to muse upon each and every idea shared by through the respective video, and if they can raise relevant, different and indifferent questions, through these..
Aptly this thinking activity is the part of such process..
 |
| Aristotle & Plato |
"Based on Aristotle's defensive approach and Plato's opposing approach towards poets and poetry"
Q.1: Arousal of emotions through outside reasons, which helps to create a poetry, is constructive or destructive for humanbeing in literal sense(while considered destructive by plato)?
Q.2: According to Aristotle, If 'Mimesis' is to make, one can make and also know it by copying something, but how one understands(Mathesis) it? could you please elaborate it in detail...
Q.3: As per Aristotle's statement, "plot is the soul of tragedy", given due importance to plot than characters and also opposed Plato's moralistic approach, then why he himself preferred 'moral characters' than fictitious one?
Q.4: Does purification through catharsis block the moral sense of thinking rationally?
.Q.5: Why as per Aristotle "plot is the soul of tragedy", does it has some root somewhere/there is any concept/myth/belief connected with it?
Explain "Freytag's pyramid" explicitly?
In this manner, what are those raisable questions, which can be raised by comprehensive understanding and in logical and critical form, which may give a new perspective, of looking towards an old concept/idea and similarly since history the game keeps on changing, from one writer to another.
Thankyou..
No comments:
Post a Comment