Post viewing tasks
Difference between the movie and the novel:
Both the things differ, concerning their featural aspects. when we see the movie we can literally see each and every minute particles of every scenes. where the producer has made changes as per himself and the movie's conveniences. While in novel we can densely and widely study and with this particular help we can accordingly visualize, if it is read rightly then only it is possible. Otherwise can be said "when there is nothing in mind, it becomes as child's mind equal to the plain paper, and what is feeded to it, it will be stored for further utilization".
Thus is the difference between movie and novel.
Does the movie help you to understand the narrative structure of the novel:
In some manner the movie has helped to understand the narrative structure(box within box technique) of the novel but for thorough understanding of aforementioned respective aspect, one needs to refer the novel, as per one's convenience.
Thus in some manner it helped a lot.
Do you think movie is helpful to provide thorough understanding of the view points of the different characters:
Yes it is helpful in providing the thorough understanding of some view points, as we can see by characters expression/attitude/manner how they may be thinking in accordance with their life and after performing each and every actions of their life and accordingly we can sketch them into our writing with the help of the words.
Thus in some manner it can be utilized.
Lady monster and Elizabeth monster in the movie and in what manner one has rejection and another has acceptance:
Both the monsters are constitution of the same chemical, but both differs in their respective demands. One is demanded and another is the cherishing wish of Victor. One is going to be created as it is the Victor God's son's wish as God(in Paradise lost) creates Eve as Adam's companion out of Adam's rib, the Monster wants "Victor" to create for him a companion as inspired by "the Delzi family" living around him. But as realized by "Victor" that this another creation would add to this particular race and perhaps they would have one after generations as humans have, he stopped him and as a result the Monster determines to kill the Victor's beloved called "Elizabeth".
After Elizabeth has been killed by Monster and as he is very much obsessive with his love, he resolves to create an another chemical monster called "Elizabeth" the whole part of body, except the neck is of "Justin" his maid and the neck portion is of "Elizabeth".
When seeing him cutting other female's body to create a "female monster" doesn't seem to be so much horrific or weird because he is doing as usual as he had done with the "Male monster".
But here with Elizabeth he has "true bondage of emotions" or can say very much obsessive in that emotions that unconcerning the proper sense and resolving to create "a chemicalizing Elizabeth" and he creates. Though by structure and face she has a very great resemblance with Elizabeth but now she has turned into monster, she is mere an empty anatomy, which has a structure but empty "as pyramid" and as one is voided(without organs) one may not have such feelings to contemplate and such is the case with "Elizabeth" that she hasn't come out of the natural process of how human beings are generated and so they are having the mutual bondage with their creator but here the creation is made up of "Galvanizing" where only the mechanism like things works and where emotions don't have that stand as technicalit has. Thus is the case with "Victor" and out of fear "female monster" is rejected and out of love, though ugly in look and a void anatomy but Elizabeth is accepted by "Victor" and eventually by self-immolating herself coming to a lethal end.
Hence in respect of intimacy and emotions both have differences so one is accepted and another is rejected.
Do you think director is faithful to the novel:
We may say "Keneth Brenagh" is faithful to the novel and he has to be. Because as a director one must know what is essential, how he will direct his play,on what depth and consistency and if it isn't marring the taste of the audience. One has to keep multisensory aspects in his/her mind(CONCERNING HIS AUDIENCE) so the charm of watching the movie isn't ruined and retaining as long as an audience want. But yes he can't picturize the whole novel in it, he has to cut off many unwanted scenes which are looking excessive and has to add scenes which are essential for the movie, especially for rendering the public's charm for the movie and the director has done its duty very well, concerning this novel.
Hence we see here how a director is becoming faithful towards his dedicated movie.
Thankyou!
Source: Movie Screening in department-Heenaba Zala ma'am. Something based on my own understanding contemplated in my answers.
Both the monsters are constitution of the same chemical, but both differs in their respective demands. One is demanded and another is the cherishing wish of Victor. One is going to be created as it is the Victor God's son's wish as God(in Paradise lost) creates Eve as Adam's companion out of Adam's rib, the Monster wants "Victor" to create for him a companion as inspired by "the Delzi family" living around him. But as realized by "Victor" that this another creation would add to this particular race and perhaps they would have one after generations as humans have, he stopped him and as a result the Monster determines to kill the Victor's beloved called "Elizabeth".
After Elizabeth has been killed by Monster and as he is very much obsessive with his love, he resolves to create an another chemical monster called "Elizabeth" the whole part of body, except the neck is of "Justin" his maid and the neck portion is of "Elizabeth".
When seeing him cutting other female's body to create a "female monster" doesn't seem to be so much horrific or weird because he is doing as usual as he had done with the "Male monster".
But here with Elizabeth he has "true bondage of emotions" or can say very much obsessive in that emotions that unconcerning the proper sense and resolving to create "a chemicalizing Elizabeth" and he creates. Though by structure and face she has a very great resemblance with Elizabeth but now she has turned into monster, she is mere an empty anatomy, which has a structure but empty "as pyramid" and as one is voided(without organs) one may not have such feelings to contemplate and such is the case with "Elizabeth" that she hasn't come out of the natural process of how human beings are generated and so they are having the mutual bondage with their creator but here the creation is made up of "Galvanizing" where only the mechanism like things works and where emotions don't have that stand as technicalit has. Thus is the case with "Victor" and out of fear "female monster" is rejected and out of love, though ugly in look and a void anatomy but Elizabeth is accepted by "Victor" and eventually by self-immolating herself coming to a lethal end.
Hence in respect of intimacy and emotions both have differences so one is accepted and another is rejected.
Do you think director is faithful to the novel:
We may say "Keneth Brenagh" is faithful to the novel and he has to be. Because as a director one must know what is essential, how he will direct his play,on what depth and consistency and if it isn't marring the taste of the audience. One has to keep multisensory aspects in his/her mind(CONCERNING HIS AUDIENCE) so the charm of watching the movie isn't ruined and retaining as long as an audience want. But yes he can't picturize the whole novel in it, he has to cut off many unwanted scenes which are looking excessive and has to add scenes which are essential for the movie, especially for rendering the public's charm for the movie and the director has done its duty very well, concerning this novel.
Hence we see here how a director is becoming faithful towards his dedicated movie.
Thankyou!
Source: Movie Screening in department-Heenaba Zala ma'am. Something based on my own understanding contemplated in my answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment